Allergy Season. Again.

Great skiing this weekend, but allergy season is gearing up even as the ski season winds down.

If you are chronically a hay fever or allergy patient, now's the time to prepare.

Sleep with your windows closed, if possible. Wash your hands after coming inside from being outdoors. If possible, avoid being out and about in mid-day since this is when pollen counts are at their highest.

If you usually take a medication that works well for you, don't wait until you're sneezing and weeping continuously to start taking it. Now is a good time to start. Once everything is covered with green pollen, you're already behind the 8-ball.

Remember that as far as pills are concerned, the more effectively they work as anti-histamines, the more likely they are to produce drowsiness.

Over-the-counter Claritin is a pretty good balance of effectiveness versus drowsiness. Zyrtec is "stonger", but more likely to make you feel sleepy and Benadryl even more so.

Avoid decongestant nose sprays such as Afrin, 4-Way or Neo-Synephrine. Use of these for over 3 days in a row can be addictive.

Prescription nose sprays such as Nasonex or generic Flonase are actually more effective than pills alone. However, you have to use them daily for the duration of the allergy season. Otherwise, they are not so effective.

Please see me if you are having allergy symptoms despite such treatment, or if you also have a lot of coughing, wheezing, chest tightness or shortness of breath. This could mean you have asthma and not just simple hay fever.

Health Care Reform

So, I'm getting a lot of folks asking how I feel about the passage of the health care reform bill (H.R. 3590- the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act), and how I think it's going to affect me and other doctors.

Mind you, these are my opinions based on following these issues for years as a doctor.

If you want to read the actual documents of this bill and of the bill that will proceed through the Senate for the President's signature (H.R. 4872- the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010), this article provides links to the full source documents.

More manageable, plain English 20+ page summaries of these bills (pdf) can be found here and here. This and this are for folks who like FAQ lists.

Generally, I like what I see.

I think it's great that the first things on the table that should occur in the next months include extending coverage for young folks to 26 years old on their parents' insurance, setting up insurance pools for people with pre-existing medical conditions, closing the Part D "donut hole" and covering preventive care for MediCare patients, and doing away with insurance company practices of capping coverage, refusing to insure patients with medical conditions, and stopping your insurance when you become ill.

Do I agree with requiring people to have insurance?
Do. The. Math. Or, consider whether you really feel okay about your taxes and premiums paying for the medical care of a healthy 20 or 30 year old who decided not to pay for insurance and then develops diabetes or has an accident. Did requiring drivers to have insurance cause premiums to go so high that you can't afford to drive? Or, is it better that if you get in an accident and the other guy is at fault that his insurance covers it because he has to have it?

Do I think it's going to bankrupt health care?
No. I believe the Congressional Budget Office.

Will it "cut down on Medicare"?
No. Remember the closing the donut hole part?

Is it okay to pay for this with taxes?
Please. We're talking tax hikes of 3.8% on unearned income of people filing over $200,000/year, or couples filing jointly over a quarter million dollars a year. People in these tax brackets have seen a 300% increase in their earnings in the past 10 years. The rest of the country (adjusted for inflation) has stayed flat over this time. I believe the super-rich can and should afford it.

But, what about my own insurance?
No downside. There's nothing in this law to keep you from staying on your present insurance if you like it. However, you might find it reassuring not to have a $1-3 million dollar lifetime cap on it if you develop and expensive problem like a cancer or a bad car accident. Also, formation of risk-sharing pools in each state should make it possible for you to get your own affordable insurance if you get fired, go to part-time, retire before 65, decide to go into business for yourself, or just don't want to go to Kaiser if the boss decides to change everyone to Kaiser. Bummer.

The government? Involved in health care?
The government already is involved; MediCare, MediCal and the VA. As far as I can tell, the private sector insurances have otherwise had free reign since World War II. I am as frustrated as any doctor with run ins with Medicare, but I also have run its with Kaiser, Blue Cross and Blue Shield. I am perfectly happy to let the government have a go at it. Heck, the seem to do just fine with having a military, enforcing the law and putting out fires. I also must say I've never had a letter or parcel lost by the Post Office.

How do I think it will affect me and my practice?
Dunno, but I remain optimistic. I look forward to not losing patients because they lose their jobs or their boss goes cheap (Kaiser). I look forward to seeing my college students and recent grads without the burden of them having to pay out of pocket. Hey, there's a good chance my own insurance rates will go down and/or that I could more easily retire before 65! Having an influx of available new patients who now have insurance? Sounds good.

Next? More jobs!

The Physical Examination

The physical examination dates back to antiquity, and is useful in assessing a number of clinical findings that can help to establish diagnosis. In other words, examination of a patient's body can help to determine what is happening and what to do.

As I was taught it, examination followed a detailed history-taking which consists of detailed questions and answers about health, symptoms and recent or past events.
I was lucky to attend a medical school (the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine). This is a very large teaching campus serving half Pennsylvania and also Ohio and West Virginia and had dedicated hospitals for veterans, children, women, ear nose and throat surgeries, eye surgeries and psychiatric patients. As the only medical students in Pittsburgh, we had the entire run of the place to ourselves. Also, the population there is the oldest in the U.S., so you do see a lot of folks. Additionally, the faculty included doctors who were very experienced and gained their experience when good history taking and physical examination skills were nearly all you had. This was before ultrasound, CT's and MRI's. Laparoscopic surgery a new technology at my time.

There are times when the physical exam is not so useful (such as discussing a new diagnosis of high cholesterol or diabetes based on abnormal screening blood tests) and other times where it is crucial (such as sore throat, abdominal pain or shortness of breath).

Unlike in days gone by when doctors rarely asked questions of their patients (such as the 1800's), I find that my teachers were correct: the majority of helping patients relies on accurate diagnosis, and the majority of diagnosis relies on history taking and a targeted examination. I continue to find it useful to elicit a full story, give patients adequate time to explain it and then ask what patients think is actually going on. Not, I admit, great for my schedule but it does help to get it right the first time whenever possible.

I see (h/t to Kevin, MD) this remains a topic of debate amongst doctors, which is not surprising in the context of advances in technology and increasing constraints on time.

This author's reflections on how technological advancement has changed medicine including the social aspects of it really resonates with me, as I see fewer and fewer of my colleagues in the hospital at all due to the trend towards doctors going fully into hospitals or fully into offices and clinics, but no longer both.

• I regret that more and more we seem to distrust our eyes (and almost all of dermatology for example relies on observation, as do a myriad of other diagnoses); we distrust our ears (and the tale the patient might tell us if we only listen long enough) and we distrust our senses. We are putting far too much emphasis on "test results" to tell us what to do next.

• We see too little of our radiology colleagues because we don't go down there as much as we used to. It's a loss--it was great to show them a CAT scan or MRI and give them the clinical context, and then hear their opinion.

• I miss the nurses' station with the chart racks which used to be the social center of each floor of the hospital. Since you can write your note from anywhere (including from Starbucks), we we wind up "talking" to each other through the medical record. We don't develop relationships that are good for coordinated patient care.

• I bemoan the fact that the art of bedside diagnosis is in danger of extinction. The people who invented these skills (beginning a hundred and fifty or more years ago) had to wait for an autopsy to reconcile what they saw or felt or heard on the outside of the body with what was actually going on inside. Now, we can make those correlations in real time; it should have made us superb at the bedside. Instead I worry we will get to a point where if you are missing a finger and show up in a hospital, no one will believe you till they get an MRI, CAT scan and an orthopedic consult.

I think this writer sums up nicely the use of a guided examination in arriving at an accurate diagnosis, which not only allows effective treatment to be started without delay, but also avoids unnecessary tests, radiation exposure and cost to the patient.

We believe that the truth is somewhere in between. We argue that clinicians who are skilled at the bedside examination make better use of diagnostic tests and order fewer unnecessary tests. If, for example, you recognise that the patient’s chest pain is confined to a dermatome and is associated with hyperaesthesia, and if you spot a few early vesicles looking like dew drops on rose petals, you have diagnosed varicella zoster and spared the patient the electrocardiography, measurement of cardiac enzymes, chest radiography, spiral computed tomography, and the use of contrast that might otherwise be inevitable. And so many clinical signs, such as rebound tenderness, lid lag, tremor, clubbing, or hemiparesis cannot be discerned by any imaging test.

Health Care Reform

On the eve of a vote on health care reform in the House, this link shows a brief summary of the bill's content.



For those with a yen for source documentation, this link is to a pdf file that shows the entire content of the bill.

Sex and the Insulin Pump

This is a well-written article by a professional teacher and writer about the impact of having an insulin pump for Type I diabetes on her feelings of sexuality and self-worth.

The article is of general interest about how chronic illness and particularly medical equipment can affect not just your health, but also sexuality.

As a doctor, it is also a reminder that medical conditions and also their treatments can affect life and also quality of life, which includes sexuality. I admit that I had not considered this in the insulin pump, though the subject often comes up in the setting of arthritis, heart attacks and cancers of the breast and prostate. "Will I spread the cancer by touching her?" "Will "being with him' cause his heart to over-work itself?" These kind of questions may be hard to ask, but they're real questions. They reflect concerns based on anxiety, love and compassion. Nothin' more real than that.

(H/t to boing boing for this link.)

Telemergency Alert Device

A patient's daughter recommended this alert device, based on her use of it for her father who is medically frail and lives alone.

(Disclaimer: this is useful information being passed on, not a product endorsement.)

The idea with alert devices is for elderly folks to have a quick and easy way to summon help if needed (think: Help! I've fallen down and I can't get up!)

The device costs about $148 (see this Amazon link) as a single purchase. Otherwise, there is no installation fee or monthly subscription fee.

You can set up to 5 numbers (including 911 if you wish) that the device will automatically dial in succession if a button is pushed on the base or on a wireless pendant. If no one answers on call #1, the device goes next to call #2, and so on. Thus, you can opt to call family or neighbors as opposed to every call out summoning the fire department.

The only potential drawbacks that have been pointed out are that the button can be activated fairly easily (as in rolling onto it in sleep), and that the device will leave a message on a message machine and stop calling further numbers. Perhaps setting calls to go to cell phones is better.